Final answer:
The reliability of documents on Augustus is complicated, as the written sources were written long after his reign and may contain biases. Assessing Augustus as a good or bad emperor requires considering multiple factors and sources. Evaluating his reign involves examining his accomplishments and the limitations of the sources.
Step-by-step explanation:
Augustus's Reliability as a Leader
The question of whether the document of the deeds and divine of Augustus is reliable or not is complex. The surviving written sources about Augustus were written many decades after his reign, making it difficult to ascertain their accuracy. Additionally, the two most important biographers, Tacitus and Suetonius, who wrote about Augustus, had biases against him. While some of the accounts may contain historical truth, others may be exaggerated or fabricated.
Assessing Augustus as an Emperor
Assessing Augustus as a good or bad emperor based on two documents is challenging. It is important to consider multiple factors and sources to form a comprehensive understanding. Evaluating Augustus's reign requires taking into account his accomplishments, such as stabilizing the empire through the Pax Romana, his efforts to improve Roman society through moral laws, and his successful consolidation of Roman power. However, it's also crucial to acknowledge the limitations of the sources and the biases of the biographers.