Question

g describe how the functionalist, conflict theorist, and symbolic interactionist would explain the social issue. how is the social practice funtional to society? what are the various ways people understand and view the name, symbol, and/or mascot? perhaps some people feel a sense of pride, others disgust and insult; talk about how/why people have very different viewpoints about the same names, symbols, or mascots. who has the most power in these situations and why? who has the least power and why?

Answer 1

Functionalists would view social issues such as the use of names, symbols, and mascots as a way of unifying a group of people in a society. This can help create a sense of community and loyalty to the group, and give people a shared identity and purpose. They would see this practice as promoting social stability and order within a society.

Conflict theorists, on the other hand, would view the use of names, symbols, and mascots as a form of power and control. They would see this practice as a way of asserting dominance over certain groups within a society and creating an unequal power dynamic. They may also argue that these symbols can perpetuate oppressive systems of power and privilege.

Symbolic interactionists would look at the use of names, symbols, and mascots from a more interpersonal perspective. They would focus on how people interact with these symbols and the meanings that they assign to them. They may argue that people view these symbols differently, depending on their own unique background, experiences, and values. For example, some people may have a sense of pride associated with a particular name, symbol, or mascot, whereas others may feel insulted or degraded by it. Symbolic interactionists would also point out that power dynamics are at

Step-by-step explanation: