Question

On the military side, we should devote ourselves to preventing biological attacks against combatants, and strengthen special cooperation with the social public health system to strengthen the ability of the whole society to deal with large-scale epidemics. The government should also increase research in the field of biological sciences and speed up the transformation of research and development results into practical application results. Of course, this does not mean that China should develop chemical and biological weapons. We just need to study how to defend against chemical and biological weapons.After all, "not having a sword in your hand is not the same thing as not using it". Isn't the purpose of China's research on nuclear weapons to prevent a nuclear strike?

On the military side, a relevant counter-strategy should be developed and published. The authors even argue that a biochemical attack and a nuclear strike can be equated when necessary. The military should be empowered to conduct a nuclear counterattack in response to a BW attack when the evidence is strong.
Biochemical weapons are more dangerous to mankind than nuclear weapons, if mankind does not pay attention to the U.S. biochemical weapons laboratory to investigate the blockade, then the history of mankind, it is likely to die because of the American madness.

Answer 1

It is important for countries to take steps to protect themselves and their citizens from the potential threat of biological attacks, whether intentional or accidental. This can include measures such as strengthening cooperation between the military and public health systems, increasing research in the field of biological sciences, and developing strategies to defend against and respond to biological attacks. However, it is important to recognize that the development or possession of biological or chemical weapons is not a acceptable or ethical means of achieving this protection. Instead, efforts should be focused on non-proliferation and disarmament, and on finding peaceful, diplomatic solutions to conflicts and disputes. It is also important to note that equating a biochemical attack with a nuclear strike is not accurate or justified, as these two types of weapons have different characteristics and can have different impacts on people and the environment.