Question

SOOOOOO MANY POINTS!!!!

What was Sandford’s argument in the Scott v. Sandford case?
A.An enslaved person in a free state should be granted freedom.
B.A person’s property cannot be taken away without due process.
C.Enslaved people should not be considered property.
D.Enslaved people should have the right to a trial by jury

Answer 1

B, i believe that B is right ,  because that's why he had a trial in the first place , and he wanted his property

Answer 2

Sandford's argument during the case was that property cannot be taken from him without due process, which is in the constitution. The court agreed with him, angering abolitionists, and celebrations went throughout the Southern states, as they labeled the Constitution as a pro-slavery document