menu
QAmmunity.org
Login
Register
My account
Edit my Profile
Private messages
My favorites
Register
Ask a Question
Questions
Unanswered
Tags
Categories
Ask a Question
In the case United States v. Cruikshank, the Supreme Court found that (A) the 1875 Civil Rights Act was unconstitutional (B) the federal government could not discriminate based on race (C) “separate but
asked
Feb 19, 2017
93.0k
views
2
votes
In the case United States v. Cruikshank, the Supreme Court found that
(A) the 1875 Civil Rights Act was unconstitutional
(B) the federal government could not discriminate based on race
(C) “separate but equal” was legal
(D) only states could enforce the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871
(E) voter qualifi cation requirements were illegal
History
high-school
Wanderson Silva
asked
by
Wanderson Silva
7.8k
points
answer
comment
share this
share
0 Comments
Please
log in
or
register
to add a comment.
Please
log in
or
register
to answer this question.
1
Answer
4
votes
In the case United States v. Cruikshank, the Supreme Court found that "
(D) only states could enforce the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871," since it held that the federal government could not impede on the 2nd amendment rights of the individual states.
Smehmood
answered
Feb 23, 2017
by
Smehmood
8.0k
points
ask related question
comment
share this
0 Comments
Please
log in
or
register
to add a comment.
Ask a Question
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.
7.6m
questions
10.2m
answers
Other Questions
What goal of the constitution was also a goal of the Magna Carta?
is it true or false that after the american revolution conflicts in the northwest territory erupted between remaining british soldiers and native americans
Who made dutch claims in north america?
How did world war 1 affect the racial and ethnic makeup of american cities
What was an effect of nationalism in Europe in the early 1900s?
Twitter
WhatsApp
Facebook
Reddit
LinkedIn
Email
Link Copied!
Copy
Search QAmmunity.org