Question

A historian is making a historical argument about the french revolution. He notes that, following the revolution, a rash of violence swept over france. He points to the execution of the french royalty and the european wars therevolutionaties launched following their victory to support this point l. In his opinion it is morally wrong for any political movement to use violence to achieve its goals based on these points, he argues that the french revolution produced far more negative outcomes

which of the following parts of the historian's argument does not rely on any historical evidence?

Answer 1

Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, the correct response would be the one having to do with the idea that the French Revolution would have gone differently without such violence, since this is impossible to prove.