41.9k views
2 votes
If a Supreme Court judge has personal religious objections to military service, but rules in favor of the draft because it is a federal law, that judge is practicing

a. judicial activism.
b. judicial restraint.
c. original jurisdiction.
d. appellate jurisdiction.

2 Answers

5 votes

Answer:

b

Step-by-step explanation:

its b

User Kanae
by
8.2k points
5 votes
If a Supreme Court judge has personal religious objections to military service, but rules in favor of the draft because it is a federal law, that judge is practicing "judicial restraint," since he or she is not letting her personal feeling get in the way of upholding the law.
User Gaurav Aggarwal
by
8.5k points