190k views
14 votes
6. Brendan is accused of armed robbery and given a trial. The jury finds Brendan innocent. The next day, the prosecutor decides that the verdict was not correct, and the orders Brendan arrested and tried for the crime again.

User Debadatta
by
5.1k points

2 Answers

12 votes

Final answer:

The subject of this question is Law. Brendan is accused of armed robbery and found innocent, but the prosecutor wants to try him again. This scenario relates to the concept of double jeopardy in law.

Step-by-step explanation:

In this scenario, the subject of the question is Law. Brendan is accused of armed robbery and given a trial. The jury finds Brendan innocent. However, the prosecutor disagrees with the verdict and decides to have Brendan arrested and tried again for the crime.

Double jeopardy is a concept in law that protects individuals from being tried for the same crime after being found not guilty. However, there are exceptions to this principle. In this case, the prosecutor believes that the initial verdict was incorrect and wants to pursue a new trial to obtain a different outcome.

It is important to note that in some cases, the prosecution may not be able to bring the same charges again after a not guilty verdict due to the principle of double jeopardy. However, there are circumstances where a new trial can take place if new evidence is discovered or if the previous trial was deemed unfair.

User Shizik
by
5.7k points
3 votes
Answer :


Violates the 5th amendment because it's double jeopardy

Hope this helps !
User Axtck
by
4.9k points