menu
QAmmunity.org
Login
Register
My account
Edit my Profile
Private messages
My favorites
Register
Ask a Question
Questions
Unanswered
Tags
Categories
Ask a Question
Why has the Supreme Court repeatedly ruled that flag burning is a protected form of political protest? Flags are not considered symbols. Flag desecration laws were violating the separation of church and
asked
Apr 17, 2016
150k
views
1
vote
Why has the Supreme Court repeatedly ruled that flag burning is a protected form of political protest?
Flags are not considered symbols.
Flag desecration laws were violating the separation of church and state.
"Government may not prohibit the expression of an idea simply because society finds the idea itself offensive."
"Truth is great and will prevail if left to itself."
History
high-school
Momoko
asked
by
Momoko
7.3k
points
answer
comment
share this
share
0 Comments
Please
log in
or
register
to add a comment.
Please
log in
or
register
to answer this question.
1
Answer
4
votes
"Government may not prohibit the expression of an idea simply because society finds the idea itself offensive" is the best option from the list, since this was the exact wording of the winning argument.
Tobiv
answered
Apr 23, 2016
by
Tobiv
7.3k
points
ask related question
comment
share this
0 Comments
Please
log in
or
register
to add a comment.
Ask a Question
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.
7.8m
questions
10.5m
answers
Other Questions
What goal of the constitution was also a goal of the Magna Carta?
is it true or false that after the american revolution conflicts in the northwest territory erupted between remaining british soldiers and native americans
Who made dutch claims in north america?
How did world war 1 affect the racial and ethnic makeup of american cities
What was an effect of nationalism in Europe in the early 1900s?
Twitter
WhatsApp
Facebook
Reddit
LinkedIn
Email
Link Copied!
Copy
Search QAmmunity.org