menu
QAmmunity.org
Login
Register
My account
Edit my Profile
Private messages
My favorites
Ask a Question
Questions
Unanswered
Tags
Categories
Ask a Question
Why has the Supreme Court repeatedly ruled that flag burning is a protected form of political protest? Flags are not considered symbols. Flag desecration laws were violating the separation of church and
asked
Apr 17, 2016
150k
views
1
vote
Why has the Supreme Court repeatedly ruled that flag burning is a protected form of political protest?
Flags are not considered symbols.
Flag desecration laws were violating the separation of church and state.
"Government may not prohibit the expression of an idea simply because society finds the idea itself offensive."
"Truth is great and will prevail if left to itself."
History
high-school
Momoko
asked
by
Momoko
8.4k
points
answer
comment
share this
share
0 Comments
Please
log in
or
register
to add a comment.
Please
log in
or
register
to answer this question.
1
Answer
4
votes
"Government may not prohibit the expression of an idea simply because society finds the idea itself offensive" is the best option from the list, since this was the exact wording of the winning argument.
Tobiv
answered
Apr 23, 2016
by
Tobiv
8.7k
points
ask related question
comment
share this
0 Comments
Please
log in
or
register
to add a comment.
← Prev Question
Next Question →
Related questions
asked
Jun 28, 2018
235k
views
Why has the Supreme Court repeatedly ruled that flag burning is a protected form of political protest? Question 6 options: Flags are not considered symbols. Flag desecration laws were violating the separation
Leon Barkan
asked
Jun 28, 2018
by
Leon Barkan
8.4k
points
Social Studies
high-school
1
answer
5
votes
235k
views
asked
Dec 22, 2021
85.3k
views
Should we amend the Constitution to allow Congress or the states to pass laws protecting the U.S. flag from desecration? Should we protect other symbols as well? What symbols? Why or why not? Please explain
Brigadir
asked
Dec 22, 2021
by
Brigadir
8.6k
points
History
college
1
answer
1
vote
85.3k
views
asked
Nov 25, 2024
162k
views
Exas v. johnson:" according to the information in paragraphs 1 and 2, what is most likely the author’s purpose for including the following in the excerpt? "held: johnson’s conviction for flag desecration
Mgraham
asked
Nov 25, 2024
by
Mgraham
8.6k
points
History
high-school
2
answers
3
votes
162k
views
Ask a Question
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.
9.5m
questions
12.2m
answers
Other Questions
is it true or false that after the american revolution conflicts in the northwest territory erupted between remaining british soldiers and native americans
Who made dutch claims in north america?
How did world war 1 affect the racial and ethnic makeup of american cities
What was an effect of nationalism in Europe in the early 1900s?
What were the positive and negative effects of Egypt being imperialized by Britain.
Twitter
WhatsApp
Facebook
Reddit
LinkedIn
Email
Link Copied!
Copy
Search QAmmunity.org