menu
QAmmunity.org
Login
Register
My account
Edit my Profile
Private messages
My favorites
Register
Ask a Question
Questions
Unanswered
Tags
Categories
Ask a Question
Why does a researcher use primary source instead of a secondary source when analyzing a historical event.?
asked
Apr 6, 2016
207k
views
4
votes
Why does a researcher use primary source instead of a secondary source when analyzing a historical event.?
History
high-school
Camillia
asked
by
Camillia
9.0k
points
answer
comment
share this
share
0 Comments
Please
log in
or
register
to add a comment.
Please
log in
or
register
to answer this question.
2
Answers
6
votes
researcher uses Primary Sources because they are often more reliable, because they are the accounts that are documented that shows how something or someone tested and successful did.
Merryl
answered
Apr 8, 2016
by
Merryl
9.0k
points
ask related question
comment
share this
0 Comments
Please
log in
or
register
to add a comment.
5
votes
A researcher uses Primary sources because they are often more reliable, because they are the accounts of the witnesses that physically watched it happen. their accounts are often more reliable.
StapleGun
answered
Apr 11, 2016
by
StapleGun
8.2k
points
ask related question
comment
share this
0 Comments
Please
log in
or
register
to add a comment.
Ask a Question
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.
9.5m
questions
12.2m
answers
Other Questions
What goal of the constitution was also a goal of the Magna Carta?
is it true or false that after the american revolution conflicts in the northwest territory erupted between remaining british soldiers and native americans
Who made dutch claims in north america?
How did world war 1 affect the racial and ethnic makeup of american cities
What was an effect of nationalism in Europe in the early 1900s?
Twitter
WhatsApp
Facebook
Reddit
LinkedIn
Email
Link Copied!
Copy
Search QAmmunity.org