167k views
1 vote
Which of the following describes an advantage that secondary sources have over primary sources for historians

User Cowmoogun
by
7.9k points

2 Answers

5 votes

Answer:

they can reveal how individuals experiencing historical events actually reacted

User Hubert Perron
by
8.7k points
5 votes
While you didn't really provide the "following" as the comment above me states, in general, the advantage of secondary sources of primary ones is that they perhaps provide a more objective or even just a broader view on a certain topic. While a primary source of the American civil war would be a letter written by a soldier, a secondary source would be a book that describes more letters taken together and discusses possible information regarding them. 
User Dlggr
by
8.8k points

No related questions found

Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.