80.4k views
3 votes
A book review would be considered

A. a primary source.
B. a secondary source.
C. a tertiary source.
D. either a secondary or tertiary source, depending on content.

1 Answer

7 votes
It is definitely not a primary source: this would be a book itself.

Now, is it a tertiary source? I don't think so: the author of the review should have read the book and should only be referring to this book in the review.

I think it's a secondary source.
User Umbrella
by
7.5k points

No related questions found

Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

9.4m questions

12.2m answers

Categories