224k views
5 votes
A lack of Vitamin D is said to be detrimental to the maintenance of bone density. If a

scientist wanted to determine whether this view was supported by scientific evidence,
which of the following would be the best method of doing so?
(a) carry out a survey of people with normal bone density to find out whether they
take Vitamin D tablets or not
(b) compare the bone density of two groups of people with low bone density after
providing only one of the groups with Vitamin D
(c) compare the incidence of people with low bone density in two different populations
(d) carry out an experiment in which a group of people with normal bone density are
exposed to very little sunlight to prevent the production of Vitamin D

2 Answers

4 votes
D is also a good option because when their little production of vitamin D we can easily determine what is the effect of this experiment to the bone density...
User Krzysztof Kozmic
by
7.3k points
4 votes
i would do B because then you can compare people who do take Vitamin D to people who don't and then you can see who has better bones and the effects. 
User Wade Huang
by
8.8k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

9.4m questions

12.2m answers

Categories