Register
Which English king was considered to be an ineffective ruler because he spent most of his reign fighting the Crusades?
128k views
1 vote
Which English king was considered to be an ineffective ruler because he spent most of his reign fighting the Crusades?

User Foxes
by
7.4k points

1 Answer

6 votes
It was Edward I who was considered to be an ineffective ruler because he spent most of his reign fighting the Crusades, since there were little "tangible returns" on his war investments at the time.
User Steve Homer
by
8.1k points
← Prev Question Next Question →

Related questions

Ask a Question
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

9.4m questions

12.2m answers

Other Questions

What goal of the constitution was also a goal of the Magna Carta?
How did world war 1 affect the racial and ethnic makeup of american cities
What was an effect of nationalism in Europe in the early 1900s?
What were the positive and negative effects of Egypt being imperialized by Britain.
What military strategy defeated Cornwallis at Yorktown?
Link Copied!