Which English king was considered to be an ineffective ruler because he spent most of his reign fighting the Crusades?

Question

asked Sep 27, 2016 128k views

1 Answer

Steve Homer · Answer 1 · 2016-10-02T22:44:35+0000

It was Edward I who was considered to be an ineffective ruler because he spent most of his reign fighting the Crusades, since there were little "tangible returns" on his war investments at the time.

Which English king was considered to be an ineffective ruler because he spent most of his reign fighting the Crusades?

Please log in or register to add a comment.

Please log in or register to answer this question.

1 Answer

Please log in or register to add a comment.

Related questions

Categories

Other Questions