Final answer:
A possible hypothesis for the statement could be that plants fertilized with fish meal will show higher growth and yield than those with artificial fertilizers due to extra micronutrients and organic matter in fish meal. This hypothesis is testable and can be supported or refuted through experimental research, helping to clarify the effects of these fertilizers on plant growth.
Step-by-step explanation:
To revise the statement "Fish meal is better than artificial fertilizers" into a hypothesis, one must restructure it to be testable and predictive. An example of a hypothesis could be "Plants fertilized with fish meal will have a higher growth rate and yield compared to plants fertilized with artificial fertilizers, due to the presence of additional micronutrients and organic matter in fish meal." To corroborate this hypothesis, experimental research involving the growth of plants with both fish meal and artificial fertilizers should be conducted and the results compared.
The creation of a hypothesis involves stating a relationship that can be tested scientifically through experimentation or observation. This process is crucial for determining if a certain factor, in this case, fish meal, has an effect on plant growth, which is preferable over another, such as artificial fertilizers. Upon examining the results, like in the deformed frogs case, a hypothesis can be supported or refuted, leading to further development of our understanding of the subject.