Final answer:
While states agreed to obey the Articles of Confederation and Congress's acts, in practice, states often ignored Congress's laws due to the non-binding nature of these acts, highlighting the limited effectiveness of the Articles. The need for stronger federal control led to the drafting of the U.S. Constitution and the inclusion of a Bill of Rights to satisfy opposition.
Step-by-step explanation:
When the states ratified the Articles of Confederation, they did agree to obey the Articles and all acts of Congress. However, in practice, states did not always honor their commitment. Under the Articles, Congress had limited power, and any laws it passed were non-binding; states had the option to enforce them or ignore them. This led to issues with the central government's ability to act effectively, since the consensus of nine states was required to pass any measure, and unanimous consent was needed for any amendments to the Articles.
This loose structure resulted in significant problems, such as states refusing to comply with Congress's laws, and led to the realization that a stronger federal government was necessary. Ultimately, the Constitution was drafted, presenting a stronger federal system, and included means for easier amendment than the unanimity the Articles demanded. To appease the Anti-Federalists, a Bill of Rights was added. The new Constitution was ratified by nine states, a number deemed sufficient for establishment, sidestepping the full consensus required under the Articles.