Register
In the Elizabethan great chain of being, which being was at the lowest rung of human society?
219k views
1 vote
In the Elizabethan great chain of being, which being was at the lowest rung of human society?

User Joseph Joseph
by
7.9k points

2 Answers

0 votes

Answer:

D. the common man

Explanation: PLATO

User Tony Basallo
by
8.8k points
5 votes
In the Elizabethan great chain of being, it was "minerals" that were at the lowest rung of human society, since it was believed that these were the foundations of plant life and nothing more. 
User Ferdil
by
8.0k points
← Prev Question Next Question →

Related questions

Ask a Question
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

9.5m questions

12.2m answers

Other Questions

What goal of the constitution was also a goal of the Magna Carta?
is it true or false that after the american revolution conflicts in the northwest territory erupted between remaining british soldiers and native americans
What was an effect of nationalism in Europe in the early 1900s?
What were the positive and negative effects of Egypt being imperialized by Britain.
Why  might  things far away  and  long  ago  be   important   to  us now.
Link Copied!