Register
Given that ray PN is the angle bisector of angle OPM, what can you conclude about NO and NM?
78.9k views
4 votes
Given that ray PN is the angle bisector of angle OPM, what can you conclude about NO and NM?

User Emmanuelguther
by
7.3k points

2 Answers

4 votes

The correct answer is NO=NM

User Tom Future
by
8.3k points
2 votes

Without the picture, nothing can be concluded, except possibly the fact
that NO and NM are not coincident (the same) segments.

If you'll claim that NO and NM are equal lengths, I'll protest, because
you never said that PO and PM are equal lengths.


User Alexandre Lavoie
by
8.3k points
← Prev Question Next Question →

Related questions

User Minseong
asked May 3, 2017 98.0k views
Given that ray PN is the angle bisector of angle OPM, what can you conclude about NO and NM?
Minseong asked May 3, 2017
by Minseong
7.8k points
2 answers
3 votes
98.0k views
Ask a Question
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

9.4m questions

12.2m answers

Other Questions

How do you can you solve this problem 37 + y = 87; y =
What is .725 as a fraction
A bathtub is being filled with water. After 3 minutes 4/5 of the tub is full. Assuming the rate is constant, how much longer will it take to fill the tub?
i have a field 60m long and 110 wide going to be paved i ordered 660000000cm cubed of cement  how thick must the cement be to cover field
The cost of 5 similar digital cameras and 3 similar video cameras is 3213. Each video camera costs 4 times as much as each digital camera. John buys a digital camera and a video camera. How much does he
Link Copied!