Question

The revision of Mexico’s constitution is considered revolutionary. Do you agree with this characterization? Why or why not?

Answer 1

The revision of Mexico's constitution is a subject of debate. Some argue that it was revolutionary because it brought about significant changes to address human rights and social justice.

Step-by-step explanation:

The characterization of the revision of Mexico's constitution as revolutionary is a subject of debate. Some argue that the revision was indeed revolutionary because it brought about significant changes to the structure and content of the constitution, addressing issues such as human rights, indigenous rights, and political organization. For example, the 1917 revision of the constitution established social rights, such as the right to education, labor rights, and land reform programs.

It also introduced measures to limit the power of the Catholic Church and strengthen the influence of the state. This comprehensive revision is seen by many as revolutionary because it aimed to reshape Mexican society and promote social justice.

Answer 2

I agree that the revision of the Constitution was "revolutionary" - that is characterized by an abrupt change. The Constitution was the fruit of the Mexican Revolution. It included many social rights not known until then (in Mexico), such as the limitation of the power of the church and a prohibition of preparing lists of forbidden books.