165k views
2 votes
Secondary sources would be valuable to a historian in order to provide

User Kharda
by
8.2k points

2 Answers

6 votes

Answer:

Secondary sources would be valuable to a historian in order to provide

a more thorough analysis of the impact on history of an event.

Explanation: took the test

User Kimberlin
by
8.5k points
7 votes
In general, secondary sources would be valuable to a historian in order to provide, and to engage with, other perspectives about a primary source or a certain historical event.
User Yancyn
by
8.6k points