Question

In the United States, governing power is divided among the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Would Machiavelli have approved of this separation of powers?

Answer 1

Machiavelli might not have fully supported the U.S. system of separation of powers, as his views favored centralized authority, which could be considered at odds with the division and balance of governmental power across multiple branches.

Step-by-step explanation:

In the United States, government power is divided among three branches: the Legislative (lawmaking), Executive (enforcing and executing laws), and Judicial (interpreting laws). This system of separation of powers and checks and balances is designed to prevent any one branch from becoming too powerful. Nicolò Machiavelli's views on governance, particularly his focus on the maintenance of power and the effectiveness of rule, suggest that he might not have fully approved of this system.

Machiavelli emphasized strong centralized authority, often vested in a singular ruler or a group capable of maintaining control and stability. He might have viewed separation of powers as a potential hindrance to decisive governance and the swift execution of laws necessary for maintaining order and authority.

Answer 2

No, he would not

Step-by-step explanation:

Machiavelli authored a popular books called the Prince. In that books, he presented his view regarding how the government should be operated.

He believed that the leader of the country should have absolute authority over the rest of the country. If the king told the people to do something , they have to obey it without any possibilities of fighting back.

The division of government into executive, legislative, and judicial branches contradict this principals. The division was created to Make the leaders of the country have lesser power. (for example, if the president want to do something unconstitutional, judicial branch can prevent it from happening)