168k views
4 votes
Which of the following describes an advantage oral history has over written history? A. Oral history creates primary sources, while written history creates only secondary sources. B. Oral history is generally credible, while written history often contains biases. C. Oral history can engage and entertain listeners by using music, rhythm, and poetry. D. Oral history can only be performed by experts with a great deal of historical knowledge.

User Trisma
by
8.5k points

2 Answers

5 votes

Answer:

C

Step-by-step explanation:

The answer is C Oral history can engage and entertain listeners by using music, rhythm, and poetry. The definition of Oral is something spoken. Therefore oral history is more engaging due to it being a resource people of all ages use for everyday things like listening to music, watching shows, etc.

User Sdu
by
7.1k points
3 votes
C. Oral history can engage and entertain listeners by using music, rhythm, and poetry.

Because oral history engages a listener through the telling of historical content, one can use the medium of sound in the form of music, rhythm, and poetry.
User White Owl
by
8.4k points