Final answer:
The correct statement is that rural communities were built based on the location of available resources. Urbanization trends show a significant shift from rural to urban living in developed countries, with a growing percentage of the population living in metropolitan areas since the 1950s. Therefore, fewer people now live in rural areas compared to 1900, contrary to the statement that more people in the U.S. live in rural communities than they did in 1900.
Step-by-step explanation:
The true statement is that rural communities were built based on the location of available resources. This is often due to the need for resources to support agricultural activities and other forms of livelihood that are prevalent in rural areas. Over time, some rural communities may have grown or transitioned based on these resource-based economies.
It is not correct to say that rural communities can support any population size, as they are often limited by the availability of jobs, infrastructure, and resources. Additionally, urbanization trends show that more people have moved to urban areas, especially in developed countries like the United States. Specifically, data indicates that the U.S. has experienced a significant rural-to-urban population shift since the 1950s. This means that fewer people live in rural communities now than they did in the past, particularly in comparison to the population numbers in 1900.
While there is evidence of some individuals seeking lifestyle changes by moving back to rural areas, this is not a general trend in developed countries, and thus cannot support the claim that people in developed countries are moving back to rural communities en masse. In contrast, the trend has been toward urban living, with an increasing number of people living in suburban and metropolitan areas.