216k views
1 vote
Which of the following describes an advantage oral history has over written history? A. Oral history creates primary sources, while written history creates only secondary sources. B. Oral history is generally credible, while written history often contains biases. C. Oral history can engage and entertain listeners by using music, rhythm, and poetry. D. Oral history can only be performed by experts with a great deal of historical knowledge.

User Djeetee
by
7.6k points

2 Answers

4 votes

Answer:

c

Step-by-step explanation:

User Arman Safikhani
by
8.7k points
4 votes
Among the choices, the one that describes an advantage oral history has over written history is C, Oral history can engage and entertain listeners by using music, rhythm, and poetry. They aren't considered primary sources because they can be changed as time goes on, depending on the storyteller.
User U Rock
by
8.4k points

No related questions found

Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.