54.1k views
4 votes
When is a secondary source more helpful than a primary source?

A: When you are an expert in the field being studied in the experiment
B: When you do not need many details about the experiment
C: When you want to know the exact data values
D: When you do not need to know the conclusion of the experiment

2 Answers

5 votes
pretty confident the answer is b
User Fourat Ben Driaa
by
9.1k points
3 votes

Answer:

B: When you do not need many details about the experiment

Step-by-step explanation:

Primary Sources are the first-hand accounts of the topic.

Secondary sources are the scholarly books or articles.

The secondary source interprets and also analyzes the primary sources.

Thus, secondary data can be used as a precursor for publishing new primary data.

Thus, Option B: When you do not need many details about the experiment is correct.

User Andre Elrico
by
8.8k points

No related questions found

Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.