Which of the following was a benefit of using Heavy Artillery instead of machine guns

QAmmunity.org

My account
Edit my Profile
Private messages
My favorites

Ask a Question
Questions
Unanswered
Tags
Categories
Ask a Question

asked Sep 26, 2017 207k views

2 votes

Which of the following was a benefit of using Heavy Artillery instead of machine guns

History
high-school

Bernard Paulus asked

by Bernard Paulus

8.3k points

0 Comments

Please log in or register to add a comment.

Please log in or register to answer this question.

1 Answer

4 votes

It fired rounds further

WhiteLine answered Oct 1, 2017

by WhiteLine

7.6k points

0 Comments

Please log in or register to add a comment.

← Prev Question Next Question →

Related questions

asked Sep 12, 2024 158k views

How far could Japanese artillery guns shoot when they fought the russians

Lxhom asked Sep 12, 2024

by Lxhom

8.3k points

History
high-school

1 answer

0 votes

158k views

asked May 17, 2024 210k views

Bofors AB is a Swedish company that specializes in the manufacturing and sales of weapon systems such as antiaircraft/antitank guns, artillery, and ammunition. The Indian government concluded an agreement

John White asked May 17, 2024

by John White

7.7k points

Business
college

1 answer

4 votes

210k views

asked Aug 21, 2024 162k views

Explain why poison gas was considered to be worse than traditional weapons like tanks, guns, and artillery.

Benjamin Horstman asked Aug 21, 2024

by Benjamin Horstman

8.4k points

Chemistry
high-school

1 answer

2 votes

162k views

Ask a Question

Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

9.5m questions

12.2m answers

0 Comments

Please log in or register to add a comment.

Please log in or register to answer this question.

1 Answer

0 Comments

Please log in or register to add a comment.

Related questions

Other Questions