Register
Why does Jackson admit that secession may be a “revolutionary act” but not a “constitutional right”?
190k views
1 vote
Why does Jackson

admit that secession
may be a “revolutionary
act” but not a
“constitutional right”?

User Blayne
by
7.5k points

1 Answer

5 votes
because the constitution exists for the sole purpose of preserving the country as a whole something that secession wouldn't do
User Brian Risk
by
7.9k points
← Prev Question Next Question →

No related questions found

Ask a Question
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

9.5m questions

12.2m answers

Other Questions

is it true or false that after the american revolution conflicts in the northwest territory erupted between remaining british soldiers and native americans
How did world war 1 affect the racial and ethnic makeup of american cities
What was an effect of nationalism in Europe in the early 1900s?
What were the positive and negative effects of Egypt being imperialized by Britain.
Why  might  things far away  and  long  ago  be   important   to  us now.
Link Copied!