Register
Why does Jackson admit that secession may be a “revolutionary act” but not a “constitutional right”?
190k views
1 vote
Why does Jackson

admit that secession
may be a “revolutionary
act” but not a
“constitutional right”?

User Blayne
by
7.5k points

1 Answer

5 votes
because the constitution exists for the sole purpose of preserving the country as a whole something that secession wouldn't do
User Brian Risk
by
7.9k points
Ask a Question
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

9.5m questions

12.2m answers

Other Questions

What goal of the constitution was also a goal of the Magna Carta?
is it true or false that after the american revolution conflicts in the northwest territory erupted between remaining british soldiers and native americans
Who made dutch claims in north america?
How did world war 1 affect the racial and ethnic makeup of american cities
What was an effect of nationalism in Europe in the early 1900s?
Link Copied!