32.1k views
2 votes
One argument that the dissenting justices make is that you cannot conclude an entire group will be disloyal just because what?

User Wumms
by
7.5k points

2 Answers

1 vote
One of the members of the group was disloyal
User Evdokia
by
8.1k points
3 votes

Answer:

One argument that dissenting judges make is that you can not conclude that an entire group will be disloyal just because one member of the group was disloyal.

Step-by-step explanation:

It is an unfair judgment to generalize an entire group of disloyal when it is proved that just as some of its members acted with disloyalty.

In politics, a dissent is the act of disagreeing with an official policy, with an instituted (or constituted) power or with a collective decision. Individuals and groups that opt ​​for dissent are called dissidents. The term is particularly applied to dissidences that take place in authoritarian and totalitarian regimes.

User Yash Dayal
by
8.6k points