32.1k views
2 votes
One argument that the dissenting justices make is that you cannot conclude an entire group will be disloyal just because what?

User Wumms
by
7.3k points

2 Answers

1 vote
One of the members of the group was disloyal
User Evdokia
by
8.1k points
3 votes

Answer:

One argument that dissenting judges make is that you can not conclude that an entire group will be disloyal just because one member of the group was disloyal.

Step-by-step explanation:

It is an unfair judgment to generalize an entire group of disloyal when it is proved that just as some of its members acted with disloyalty.

In politics, a dissent is the act of disagreeing with an official policy, with an instituted (or constituted) power or with a collective decision. Individuals and groups that opt ​​for dissent are called dissidents. The term is particularly applied to dissidences that take place in authoritarian and totalitarian regimes.

User Yash Dayal
by
8.1k points

Related questions

Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.