Final answer:
The Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 increased federal intervention in state affairs, leading to Northern anger. 'Bleeding Kansas' stemmed from violent clashes between proslavery and antislavery groups. South Carolina seceded due to the election of Lincoln and the threat to slavery, not directly because of the Fugitive Slave Act.
Step-by-step explanation:
The Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 and its Impact
The Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 angered Northerners because it increased federal intervention in the affairs of independent states and made it a crime not to help capture those who escaped slavery. It was part of the Compromise of 1850, which aimed to solve the nation's problems regarding the question of slavery in new territories.
Bleeding Kansas and its Significance
The term “Bleeding Kansas” can be attributed to the competition of opposing political groups — proslavery and Free-Soil forces — in a violent conflict over the decision of whether to allow slavery within the Kansas territory, a concept driven by the principle of popular sovereignty from the Kansas-Nebraska Act.
Secession of South Carolina
South Carolina seceded from the Union primarily due to Abraham Lincoln's election as president in 1860, which was seen as a threat to the institution of slavery. It was not directly related to the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850, but rather a culmination of increasing sectional tensions including the impact of acts like the Kansas-Nebraska Act and events such as John Brown's raid on Harper's Ferry.