Question

Which statement is most likely an interpretation of the Second Amendment?

A. No one should be able to own or use a gun.
B. Only local governments can pass gun laws.
C. Bearing arms is only for the purpose of hunting.
D. There should be no limits on owning and using guns.

Answer 1

the correct answer is D: There should be no limits on owning and using guns.

Step-by-step explanation:

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

Answer 2

The Second Amendment to the Constitution of United States states:

"...the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. "

From the given options, the option D is the most likely interpretation of the second amendment i.e. There should be no limits on owning and using guns. The point highlighted in rest of the options is not listed anywhere in the amendment.

Therefore, the correct option is D.
There should be no limits on owning and using guns.