117k views
3 votes
To begin an indirect proof you assume the converse of what you intend to prove is true

User Alex West
by
8.1k points

2 Answers

1 vote

Answer:

false

Explanation:

statement: if apple, than it is fruit

converse: if fruit, than it is apple (not always true)

The converse statement is sometimes true sometimes not

User Vitjbr
by
8.0k points
3 votes

False. The converse may be either true or false, depending on what the original statement is, so assuming the converse would be pointless.

User Purplejacket
by
8.6k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

9.4m questions

12.2m answers

Categories