Final answer:
The student uses anecdotal evidence to express their situation and individual educational desires, which are at odds with the school's required curriculum. The student views media as a means to effectively communicate and fulfill personal goals, but also faces the challenge of balancing school mandates with individual aspirations.
Step-by-step explanation:
The student in the provided scenario uses anecdotal evidence to underpin their argument. This type of evidence is derived from their personal experiences and emotions related to their inability to enroll in a journalism class that aligns with their communication major goals. They express frustration by sharing how the school system's requirements conflict with their personal aspirations, suggesting that educational institutions should be more flexible in allowing students to pursue courses that match their individual interests and career objectives. The student envisions themselves possibly engaging with various means of media as more effective tools for conveying their issues and strengthening their message.
Furthermore, schools do indeed have the responsibility to balance personal fulfillment and the creation of good citizens, but they also must meet educational standards and prepare students with a well-rounded curriculum. This is a delicate equilibrium, where required classes are often mandated to ensure a foundational education that is deemed essential for all students, regardless of their individual career paths. In the context of the student's situation, it might be worth exploring alternative means to engage in journalism activities outside the formal class structure, such as starting a blog, becoming a citizen journalist, or participating in related extracurricular activities.