Final answer:
The isotope with a mass of 42.0 amu is less abundant because the atomic weight of the element is closer to the mass of the other isotope, 40.0 amu. We lack sufficient information to determine the element's number of protons, neutrons, and electrons, or to confirm if the element is calcium.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question concerns the relative abundance of isotopes and their contribution to the atomic weight of a new element. Given that the atomic weight is 40.50 g/mol, which is very close to the mass of one of its isotopes (40.0 amu), and the other isotope has a mass of 42.0 amu, we can infer that the isotope with the lower mass is more abundant because the average atomic weight is closer to it. Therefore, statement (a) 'the isotope at 42.0 amu is less abundant' is true.
To determine the number of protons and neutrons in an isotope, we would need to know the exact element, which is not provided in the question. However, since statement (g) 'the element is calcium' cannot be true without the atomic number (number of protons), which defines an element, we cannot confirm this without additional information. Therefore, all other statements regarding the number of protons, neutrons, and electrons cannot be confirmed as true or false based on the given information.