Register
Why would a researcher use a secondary source instead of a primary source when analyzing a historical event?
74.1k views
0 votes
Why would a researcher use a secondary source instead of a primary source when analyzing a historical event?

User TSR
by
8.7k points

1 Answer

2 votes
well sometimes you may not have access to a document that was made during the same time period as the historical subject that is being studied. Therefore, a secondary source would be better to use to understand more about subject you are studing.
User Buyuk
by
8.2k points
← Prev Question Next Question →

No related questions found

Ask a Question
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

9.5m questions

12.2m answers

Other Questions

What goal of the constitution was also a goal of the Magna Carta?
is it true or false that after the american revolution conflicts in the northwest territory erupted between remaining british soldiers and native americans
Who made dutch claims in north america?
How did world war 1 affect the racial and ethnic makeup of american cities
What was an effect of nationalism in Europe in the early 1900s?
Link Copied!