Why would a researcher use a secondary source instead of a primary source when analyzing a historical event?

Question

asked Apr 23, 2017 74.1k views

1 Answer

Buyuk · Answer 1 · 2017-04-28T05:39:37+0000

well sometimes you may not have access to a document that was made during the same time period as the historical subject that is being studied. Therefore, a secondary source would be better to use to understand more about subject you are studing.

Why would a researcher use a secondary source instead of a primary source when analyzing a historical event?

Please log in or register to add a comment.

Please log in or register to answer this question.

1 Answer

Please log in or register to add a comment.

No related questions found

Categories

Other Questions