Register

What is the generalization Rowlandson implies? The settlers were not able to defend themselves. The Indians separated men from the women. The Indians were bloodthirsty heathens.…

What is the generalization Rowlandson implies? The settlers were not able to defend themselves. The Indians separated men from the women. The Indians were bloodthirsty heathens.…
91.7k views
1 vote
What is the generalization Rowlandson implies?

The settlers were not able to defend themselves.
The Indians separated men from the women.
The Indians were bloodthirsty heathens.
The women were all butchered.

User Hugo Jordao
by
8.1k points

1 Answer

4 votes
I suggest you to choose this option: The Indians were bloodthirsty heathens.
User JustLoren
by
9.1k points
← Prev Question Next Question →

Related questions

User Samuel Dressel
asked Feb 1, 2024 53.6k views
Why was Robespierre called bloodthirsty Dictator?
Samuel Dressel asked Feb 1, 2024
by Samuel Dressel
8.9k points
1 answer
4 votes
53.6k views
Ask a Question
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

9.4m questions

12.2m answers

Categories

Other Questions

Passe para a voz passiva: - Kevin asked Dennis a question -Somebody Build the house last year -She gives him a box
Who is the author of Alice's Adventures in Wonderland'??
why is mercury usually hard to see without a telescope?
Link Copied!