19.7k views
4 votes
How can the text often a limb must be amputated to save a life, but a life is never wisely given to save a limb best be interpreted?. . A. If you cut off one bad part, you run the risk of killing the entire body.. . B. It is never wise to get rid of one bad part to save the larger whole.. . C. It is often necessary to get rid of one bad part to save the larger whole.. . D. It is often necessary to let an entire body die rather than cutting off a limb.

User Sakshi
by
6.6k points

2 Answers

3 votes
The best way that the text often a limb must be amputated to save a life, but a life is never wisely given to save a limb can best be interpreted is described in answer choice C) It is often necessary to get rid of one bad part to save the larger whole.

I hope it helps, Regards.
User Johlo
by
7.5k points
4 votes
The correct answer is C. It is often necessary to get rid of one bad part to save the larger whole.

Instead of having something become ruined entirely, sometimes it is a necessity to make a sacrifice that would be for the greater good.
User Mosh Feu
by
6.4k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.