menu
QAmmunity.org
Login
Register
My account
Edit my Profile
Private messages
My favorites
Register
Ask a Question
Questions
Unanswered
Tags
Categories
Ask a Question
What is your opinion of the balance of nature hypothesis? Would the deer on the island be better off, worse off, or about the same without the wolves.defend your position
asked
Jun 17, 2017
206k
views
3
votes
What is your opinion of the balance of nature hypothesis? Would the deer on the island be better off, worse off, or about the same without the wolves.defend your position
Biology
high-school
Evgeniy Malyutin
asked
by
Evgeniy Malyutin
7.5k
points
answer
comment
share this
share
0 Comments
Please
log in
or
register
to add a comment.
Please
log in
or
register
to answer this question.
1
Answer
6
votes
the would be worse off without the wolves. In an environment you need all orders of populous in order to keep balance. Without the wolves present the deer would have no natural predator and as such would become overpopulated and then all of the deer would starve from a lack of food. It is the wolves purpose to regulate the deer population.
Amleszk
answered
Jun 21, 2017
by
Amleszk
7.8k
points
ask related question
comment
share this
0 Comments
Please
log in
or
register
to add a comment.
Ask a Question
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.
9.5m
questions
12.2m
answers
Other Questions
Which of the objects is living or nonliving: Bacteria, virus, moss, you, a lemon seed, the air, bread, lettuce and rocks?
Why aren't all minerals gemstones?
What are three important types of forces
How can paleontologists help us understand the past
What is the phenotype of a heterozygous person using T for tall and t for short
Twitter
WhatsApp
Facebook
Reddit
LinkedIn
Email
Link Copied!
Copy
Search QAmmunity.org