Question

A pair of scientists proposes two different theories to explain the same set of observations. Which of the following best explains the value of these competing theories?

Competing theories can be a source of new, testable ideas.
Competing theories are necessary to transform a theory into a law.
Competing theories generate controversy that helps popularize ideas.
Competing theories allow scientists to combine the most interesting aspects of both theories.

Answer 1

Competing theories can be a source of new, testable ideas.

Answer 2

Competing theories can be a source of new, testable ideas.

Step-by-step explanation:

Theory is the set of knowledge that seeks to explain, with a high degree of accuracy, all-encompassing phenomena of nature, that is, it is different from the meaning of the word "theory" used in everyday life, when we say that something "is only a theory "in the sense that it is a mere speculation.

Competing theories present a much larger set of knowledge, which gives the universe a source of new and testable ideas