140k views
4 votes
In the fictional Stolen Valor Act case of US v. Fields, what was the argument of the prosecution from Field's lies?

2 Answers

6 votes

Answer:

In Short the answer is A

Step-by-step explanation:

;)

User Timing
by
8.7k points
1 vote
The agrument was Protected by free-speech. The law made it a government crime to erroneously speak to oneself as having gotten any U.S. military beautification or decoration. In the event that sentenced, respondents may have been detained for up to a half year, unless the adornment lied about is the Medal of Honor, in which case detainment could have been dependent upon one year.
User Caroline Orr
by
7.7k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.