194k views
4 votes
The federal government approves additional funding for food resources in Africa. Which of the following would be a potential negative externality for the global environment?

A. Demands on food resources in Africa increase.
B. Incidents of starvation-related illnesses decrease.
C. Local economies benefit from increasing number of aid workers.
D. Other countries follow suit and shift funds from conservation to food.

User Safron
by
8.6k points

2 Answers

3 votes
Hello!

From the list, the only negative thing is: A. Demands on food resources in Africa increase.



Hugs!
User Anil Solanki
by
7.4k points
2 votes
"Demands on food resources in Africa increase" is the one among the following that would be a potential negative externality for the global environment. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the first option or option "A". I hope it helps you.
User Lwin
by
9.2k points