Question

in response to peer review, a scientific journal might choose not to publish a paper submitted by a scientist. which of the following is a reason why a paper might be rejected for publication?

Answer 1

Paper can be rejected because of flaws within the content of the paper

Step-by-step explanation:

A paper may be rejected because of the following reasons -

a) The paper is not having relevant sources.

b) There can be some plagiarism issue with the text of the paper

c) It may not be having a research write up

d) The topic of the paper doesn't match with the subject of the journal.

e) There can be issues with the hypothesis discussed with in the paper.

f) May be the result obtained do not bear any conscience.

Answer 2

Here are the choices for the given question above:
A. The experimental results failed to support the conclusion.
B. The accompanying photographs were not sensational enough.
C. The opening sentence was incapable of capturing a reader's interest.
D. The reported discovery had no potential commercial value.

Well the answer is A. The experimental results failed to support the conclusion.