120k views
4 votes
The federal government approves additional funding for food resources in Africa. Which of the following would be a potential negative externality for the global environment?

Demands on food resources in Africa increase
Incidents of starvation-related illness decrease
Local economies benefit from increasing number of aid workers
Other countries follow suit and shifts funds from conservation to food

User Shabib
by
7.5k points

2 Answers

2 votes

B. Incidents of starvation-related illnesses decrease.

User Chris Brandt
by
7.9k points
6 votes
The answer to your question would be the second statement. I think that the incidents of starvation-related illness decrease would be a potential negative externality for the global environment. In this case, if the Federal government approved additional funding for food resources in Africa.
User Claudiu Iordache
by
8.9k points