120k views
4 votes
The federal government approves additional funding for food resources in Africa. Which of the following would be a potential negative externality for the global environment?

Demands on food resources in Africa increase
Incidents of starvation-related illness decrease
Local economies benefit from increasing number of aid workers
Other countries follow suit and shifts funds from conservation to food

User Shabib
by
7.5k points

2 Answers

2 votes

B. Incidents of starvation-related illnesses decrease.

User Chris Brandt
by
7.9k points
6 votes
The answer to your question would be the second statement. I think that the incidents of starvation-related illness decrease would be a potential negative externality for the global environment. In this case, if the Federal government approved additional funding for food resources in Africa.
User Claudiu Iordache
by
8.9k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.