Answer:
C. The Twelve Tables and the Biography of Julius Caesar
Step-by-step explanation:
In the beginning of the republic, Roman law was held in the psyches and recollections of Rome's judges and justices. Such a framework was prime for maltreatment. A judge could overlook or even change laws spontaneously, and there was no real way to address him. What's more, since officers were blue-bloods (or patricians, as the Romans called them), the average citizens, or plebs, had little any desire for discovering equity in such a framework.
The plebs challenged this equity framework for a long time, until finally, in 450 BCE, Roman law was systematized and recorded in the well known Twelve Tables of Rome. This composed law ensured that all, high just as low, were liable to the laws of Rome.
As the years passed by and the republic developed and turned out to be increasingly comprehensive, the Roman lawful framework was transformed to oblige these changes. The decisions of judges started to be utilized as a point of reference for future cases, as did the declarations of praetors. At the same time, philosophical thoughts from Stoicism found their way into Roman law.
These changes did not stop with the passing of the republic and the ascent of the Principate. Roman sovereigns, attempting to manage the new difficulties of the domain, would regularly choose magnificent legal advisers to refine and translate the law. From Gaius to Ulpian to Paulus, these legal scholars set up the philosophical underpinnings of law, making a way of thinking of equity that suffers right up 'til today.