141k views
0 votes
In the Dred Scott case, the Supreme Court decided

End of exam
A. the Missouri Compromise was illegal because it was illegal for Congress to deprive a slave owner of property (slaves) without
the due process of law.
B. the Missouri Compromise was illegal because it freed slaves in the slave states.
C. the Compromise of 1850 was illegal because it was illegal for Congress to deprive a slave owner of property (slaves) without
the due process of law.
D. the Missouri Compromise was illegal because it was illegal for Congress to deprive a slave of his or her freedom if they lived
in the South.

User Radek
by
7.6k points

2 Answers

3 votes
well the supreme court ruled that dredd Scott was still a slave and was still technically property to his master.
User Zeisi
by
7.8k points
1 vote
a. the Missouri compromise was illegal without due process of law

User Nick Rupley
by
7.4k points