Final answer:
The best point estimate of the population proportion of lakes with unsafe concentrations of acid rain pollution is 22.5%. The 95% confidence interval for the population proportion is (0.158, 0.292), which does not contain the politician's claim of 20%. Therefore, the study provides overwhelming evidence to contradict the politician's views at the 95% level of confidence.
Step-by-step explanation:
(a) Point Estimate:
The best point estimate of the population proportion of lakes that have unsafe concentrations of acid rain pollution is 45/200 = 0.225 or 22.5%.
Error Bound:
To calculate the error bound, we use the formula:
Error Bound = Z * √(p*(1-p)/n)
Where Z is the z-score corresponding to our desired level of confidence (95%), p is the point estimate, and n is the sample size.
For a 95% confidence interval, the z-score is approximately 1.96. Therefore, the error bound is:
Error Bound = 1.96 * √((0.225*(1-0.225))/200)
Error Bound = 0.067
(b) 95% Confidence Interval:
The 95% confidence interval for the population proportion is given by:
Point Estimate ± Error Bound
0.225 ± 0.067
The confidence interval is (0.158, 0.292).
(c) Contradicting the Politician's Views:
We can use the 95% confidence interval to determine whether the study provides overwhelming evidence to contradict the politician's statement.
If the 95% confidence interval contains the politician's claim (20%), then it does not provide overwhelming evidence to contradict his views. However, if the confidence interval does not contain the politician's claim, then it does provide overwhelming evidence to contradict his views.
In this case, the confidence interval (0.158, 0.292) does not contain the politician's claim of 20%. Therefore, the study does provide overwhelming evidence to contradict the politician's views at the 95% level of confidence.