Question

Which of the following best describes the basis of Dred Scott’s legal case?

A) The Missouri Compromise stated that when an enslaved worker moved to a free state or territory, that person became free.
B) The Fugitive Slave Act stated that when an enslaved person escaped to a free state or territory, that person became free.
C) The Fugitive Slave Act stated that when a fugitive was captured in the North, that person did not have the right to a trial.
D) The Missouri Compromise stated that when a free African American entered a slave state, that person became enslaved.

Answer 1

I think the answer is a

Answer 2

A) The Missouri Compromise stated that when an enslaved worker moved to a free state or territory, that person became free.

Step-by-step explanation:

On the issue of Dred Scott about social liberties in America, the Supreme Court deciding was that neither one of the free blacks or slaves could be American natives. That slaves were property and if the proprietors moved to another state, the slave was still property.

What's more, that the Missouri bargain was illegal in light of the fact that Congress had no capacity to choose where slavery was permitted. The interest of Dred Scott was that he ought to be free since his proprietor had lived in an state that promoted freedom, and after that he moved to a state that bolstered slavery.