Question

How did the decision in regents v. Bakke affect individual rights?

B: it protected rights by letting race be an admission factor
C: it limited rights by giving all minorities higher priority
D: it protected rights by making all individuals equal

Answer 1

B. It protected rights by letting race be an admission factor.

In Regents of the University of California v. Bakke (1978), the Supreme Court's decision gave some credence to Allan Bakke's claim that the University of California at Davis had practiced some amount of reverse discrimination in denying him admittance to the medical school because he was not an economically or educationally disadvantaged member of one of four racial/ethnic groups eligible for their special admission program. But the Court was careful to note that race could be considered as a factor (among many factors) in college admissions, with schools needing to practice great care in doing so. Having a basic quota system, such as UC Davis reserving 16 spots out of 100 each year, was considered discriminatory.

Answer 2

The answer would be B. It protected rights by letting race be an admission Factor

despite Bakke Victory on the court ( the court still ordered the university to admit Bakke), The supreme Court finally decided that Race is allowed to be an Admission Factor.