Final answer:
Non-Bostonians objected to the Coercive Acts because they felt these laws infringed on colonial liberties, disrupted economic activity, and highlighted the need for a united opposition against British policies.
Step-by-step explanation:
People outside of Boston objected to these laws, known as the Coercive Acts, because they were seen as an infringement on the rights and liberties of the colonists as members of the British Empire. These acts virtually eliminated self-governance in Massachusetts, dictating how the colony was to be run and punishing it by closing Boston Harbor until the East India Company was repaid for lost tea during the Boston Tea Party. Furthermore, the Coercive Acts' impact on Boston's economy and its political autonomy provoked sympathy and a sense of shared destiny among the colonies, leading to a united front against British overreach. This unification eventually contributed to the formation of the First Continental Congress as a collective colonial response against the British government.