Why is an article written about a famous explorer considered a secondary source

asked Feb 10, 2017 136k views

2 votes

by Coiso

8.5k points

0 Comments

Please log in or register to add a comment.

6 votes

Pretty sure because it's written by a point of view was not there at the time the event occurred

Chris Emerson answered Feb 10, 2017

8.3k points

0 Comments

1 vote

It is considered as a Secondary Source because it isn't original, it was created after the event, not during the event.

Kevin Borders answered Feb 16, 2017

8.3k points

0 Comments

Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

9.4m questions

12.2m answers